Support during administrative proceedings

Responses grounded in evidence and the authority's questions

We first read the request alongside the available documentation and previous correspondence. Questions needing a clearer description are separated from those revealing missing data, inconsistent assumptions or a need for further assessment. This establishes what can be answered using existing material and what requires input from the developer, operator or designer before a response can be completed.

Responses are structured so that each can be traced to the relevant question. Supplementary material may include technical descriptions, data schedules, corrected assumptions or outputs from agreed analyses. We check how new information affects other documents, because even a single parameter change may require revisions to several related tables, maps and conclusions in the submitted package.

The service focuses on substantive explanations and technical documentation. Where a question extends beyond technical assessment, we identify the need to coordinate with the person providing legal support. The client can see which elements of the response are complete and which depend on additional evidence, helping organise the subsequent steps in the proceedings.

Technical data

Subject Authority requests, supplementary documentation and technical explanations
Service type Technical support during administrative proceedings
Assessment basis and requirements The request, previously submitted documents, correspondence and current project or installation information.
Method
  1. Map the authority's questions to the relevant document sections.
  2. Identify data and assessments needed to answer each question.
  3. Prepare explanations and the agreed supporting material.
  4. Check updates for consistency with other documents in the proceedings.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive supplementary documentation, explanations and responses addressing the agreed scope of the request. The material identifies source evidence and links with documents already prepared. It helps the developer, operator or adviser handling the proceedings present a consistent position and recognise issues still requiring a design decision, source information or further technical analysis.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Post-completion environmental assessment

Understanding actual impacts after commissioning

The assessment programme starts with the scope in the project's documents. We establish environmental components, locations and assessment conditions, together with information required from the operator. Measurements must be linked to the facility's operating state: results obtained at partial load or during unusual activity may not be comparable with the assumptions adopted for the development.

We coordinate the necessary measurements and collect records of how the installation operated during the work. Results are compared with the relevant decision conditions and earlier assessment. Differences are explained in light of design changes, actual operating parameters and limits to comparability. This avoids treating numbers obtained under different technical circumstances as if they represented the same scenario.

The report explains what the findings show about the operating development and whether further verification or impact reduction should be considered. Measurement-supported conclusions are separated from questions needing additional evidence. Clear reference to the conditions assessed helps the operator use the report appropriately, including when considering later changes to the way the facility is used.

Technical data

Subject Actual environmental impacts of a development after commissioning
Service type Post-completion assessment using measurements and operational information
Assessment basis and requirements Project decision conditions, earlier assessment documentation and measurement methods appropriate to the environmental components covered.
Method
  1. Define the assessment programme from relevant decision conditions.
  2. Link measurements to documented facility operating conditions.
  3. Compare results with earlier assumptions and applicable requirements.
  4. Interpret differences and identify any further actions needed.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive a post-completion assessment report describing its scope, results and assessment conditions. It compares actual impacts with the relevant assumptions and decision conditions, explains significant differences and presents conclusions. The report provides an organised basis for subsequent documentation, further checks or consideration of measures to reduce the facility's environmental impacts.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Environmental decision (DŚU) application support

Coordinating documentation for the environmental decision procedure

We begin by defining the development, its preparation stage and the studies already available. We establish the technical, site and specialist information required and how to keep it consistent. A clear project boundary is essential so that appendices, assessments and explanations do not describe different parameters for the same proposed installation or development option.

We coordinate documentation suited to the identified procedure, involving the specialists needed for the project. We organise questions for the developer and designers and support preparation of explanations and supplementary material during the proceedings. Dependencies between updated documents are checked so that answering one question does not leave contradictory information elsewhere in the application package.

The service covers document preparation and procedural support within agreed boundaries, not a promise of a particular decision. Analyses may need to expand following issues raised in the proceedings or changes to the project. We explain the implications and agree the necessary additional work rather than treating the initial document list as fixed regardless of subsequent developments.

Technical data

Subject Project documentation for the Polish environmental decision (DŚU) procedure
Service type Documentation preparation, coordination and procedural support
Assessment basis and requirements Project parameters, the applicable procedural route, documentation requirements and correspondence received from authorities.
Method
  1. Define the development and review the available source documents.
  2. Coordinate information from the developer, designers and specialists.
  3. Prepare a consistent package of materials for the procedure.
  4. Develop agreed supplementary documents and technical explanations.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive the agreed documentation package and support during the environmental decision procedure. The package combines the relevant studies and appendices with organised explanations prepared as the matter progresses. Your project team gains consistent material for subsequent steps and visibility of issues requiring additional data, design decisions or specialist input within the agreed scope.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Project information sheet (KIP)

A coherent project description at the KIP stage

The KIP starts with understanding what is proposed and how it will operate. We collect information on location, scale, technology, layout and the anticipated construction and operational stages. Where an existing facility is being changed, we distinguish current activities from the proposed works so that the description preserves the actual boundaries of the development under consideration.

We then identify environmental topics to be addressed in the information sheet. Necessary specialist analyses and mapping are prepared or coordinated and checked against the project description. Particular attention is given to emission sources, operating assumptions and relationships with the surroundings. Missing information is identified before assumptions are presented as final project parameters in the document.

The KIP is a separate document from a full environmental impact assessment report. Preparing it does not predetermine the subsequent procedure or replace every detailed study. Content is matched to the development and available information. Material concept changes are carried through to associated analyses and appendices so that the package continues to describe a consistent project.

Technical data

Subject The proposed development, its location and anticipated environmental impacts
Service type Project information sheet with supporting analyses and appendices
Assessment basis and requirements Project concept and technical data, site information and the information scope applicable to the Polish KIP.
Method
  1. Collect project parameters and information about the surroundings.
  2. Identify topics requiring specialist environmental analysis.
  3. Prepare the description, analyses and associated mapping.
  4. Check consistency of parameters between the KIP and its appendices.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive a KIP with the agreed appendices, necessary specialist analyses and maps. The document presents the development using a consistent set of data and explains the assumptions adopted. It provides material for the environmental procedure and further project work while maintaining the distinction between a project information sheet and a full environmental impact assessment report.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Environmental impact assessment report (ROŚ)

A connected assessment of impacts, alternatives and mitigation

The report is based on defined project boundaries and information about the surrounding environment. We establish the assessment components, source data and need for investigations, analysis or modelling. Shared assumptions about construction stages, installation parameters and operating arrangements are essential: they allow specialist findings to be compared without mixing incompatible scenarios or different design versions.

We coordinate specialist contributions and combine the results into an assessment of the alternatives under consideration. The significance of impacts and proposed mitigation is examined in relation to specific sources and environmental receptors. Methods, evidence and limitations are documented so that the reasoning can be followed from project parameters through the analysis to the report's conclusions.

Findings should also inform subsequent design. We identify protective measures and operating assumptions on which the assessment depends and which need to be retained as the development progresses. Evidence-supported findings are distinguished from matters needing further investigation, helping the project team interpret results in context rather than relying on isolated numerical outputs.

Technical data

Subject Impacts of a development, its alternatives and proposed mitigation
Service type Comprehensive environmental impact assessment report
Assessment basis and requirements The assessment scope applicable to the project, design documents, environmental data and appropriate specialist assessment methods.
Method
  1. Define assessment components, alternatives and shared input data.
  2. Coordinate the investigations, calculations and specialist analyses required.
  3. Compare alternative impacts and the effects of proposed mitigation.
  4. Integrate findings, limitations and design guidance into a coherent report.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive a ROŚ with appendices and specialist analyses for the agreed project scope. The report presents alternatives, anticipated impacts and mitigation measures with their supporting reasoning. It also records assessment assumptions and limitations, enabling the developer's team to connect environmental conclusions with subsequent design decisions and documentation used in the procedure.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Specialist environmental input for KIP and ROŚ

Specialist input that fits the lead document

Before work begins, we agree the question the analysis must answer with the developer, designer or consultancy. We define the specialist boundaries, alternatives to assess, data requirements and format of the output. Site, project-stage and operating assumptions are checked against the current KIP or ROŚ version being prepared by the team leading the documentation.

Document review, measurements or modelling are selected to suit the environmental component and the purpose of the assessment. Results are accompanied by input data, methods and interpretation limits. The objective is not only to produce a result, but to provide conclusions and supporting material that the lead author can connect logically with other parts of the project assessment.

The service covers the agreed specialist contribution, not automatically the whole KIP or ROŚ. We flag inconsistencies and information requiring agreement with other disciplines. If project parameters change, we identify the implications for the completed assessment so that earlier findings are not applied outside the conditions for which they were developed and documented.

Technical data

Subject A selected environmental component within KIP or ROŚ documentation
Service type Specialist analysis, measurements or modelling contribution
Assessment basis and requirements Lead-document requirements, shared project assumptions and methods appropriate to the environmental component assessed.
Method
  1. Agree contribution boundaries and coordination with the lead author.
  2. Review input data and the alternatives requiring assessment.
  3. Undertake the selected analysis, measurements or modelling.
  4. Provide results, conclusions and assumptions for consistent integration.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive the agreed specialist input for a KIP or ROŚ, including the analysis and relevant outputs, with the input data and method explained. Conclusions are prepared for use by the lead author. The package also identifies dependencies on project parameters and matters requiring coordination, making it easier to integrate the work of different specialists.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Preliminary environmental screening of a project

Understanding the environmental route from the outset

A project title rarely provides enough information to establish its environmental context. We examine the actual work proposed, technological parameters, operating scale and links to existing infrastructure. For an expansion, we distinguish the current facility from the proposed change. This identifies the characteristics relevant to screening and aspects of the concept that the developer or designer needs to clarify.

We combine technical information with an initial review of the site and available documents. We identify possible procedures, dependencies between decisions and subjects requiring specialist assessment. Rather than immediately producing a full documentation package, we organise the sequence of work and highlight the information needed to define subsequent tasks with greater confidence and consistent assumptions.

The outcome is a preliminary assessment of the supplied concept, not an authority's decision or a complete application package. Changes to parameters, location or implementation can affect the recommended route. Assumptions and unresolved questions are stated clearly so that the team knows which findings need to be revisited as the project develops.

Technical data

Subject A new project concept or a proposed change to an existing installation
Service type Preliminary environmental and procedural screening
Assessment basis and requirements Concept parameters, site information and procedural requirements selected for the identified type of development.
Method
  1. Define project boundaries and links to the existing facility.
  2. Review parameters relevant to possible environmental approval routes.
  3. Identify decisions, dependencies and significant information gaps.
  4. Set out the sequence of further assessments and document preparation.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive an overview of requirements, risks and next steps for the concept reviewed. It sets out the possible environmental route, necessary information and topics requiring further assessment. The material helps plan design and documentation commissions and separates findings available now from those dependent on further development of the project's parameters and solutions.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Environmental support during project design

Environmental requirements within the design process

Design develops across several disciplines, while information needed for environmental assessment often comes from different teams. We identify the solution parameters, operating conditions and layout features that may influence environmental impacts. Available decisions and earlier studies are reviewed to establish which assumptions should be retained and which need to be examined again as the project progresses.

Our role is to translate identified requirements into information designers can use. We specify data needed from suppliers, dependencies between disciplines and issues requiring further calculations. Proposed changes are discussed against the agreed project description. A record of matters to be agreed allows the team to distinguish resolved questions from those still open and needing an assigned response.

Environmental support does not replace designers' responsibility for their own disciplines. It provides guidance and identifies risks using the current design version. When material parameters change, we assess their effect on previous findings and identify analyses needing revision instead of automatically carrying earlier conclusions over to a different technical solution or operating scenario.

Technical data

Subject Design assumptions, equipment parameters and requirements for project disciplines
Service type Environmental design review and multidisciplinary coordination support
Assessment basis and requirements Current design documents, decisions relating to the development and technical data for the proposed solutions.
Method
  1. Identify design parameters relevant to environmental impacts.
  2. Review assumptions against documents and previous agreements.
  3. Prepare guidance and questions for designers and suppliers.
  4. Update the coordination record following changes to discipline designs.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive environmental design guidance and a list of matters requiring agreement between teams. The material identifies significant parameters, missing data and subjects requiring more detailed assessment. It helps maintain consistent assumptions across documents and assess design changes before they are incorporated into subsequent studies, specifications or procurement of equipment and technical solutions.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Environmental advisory support

A clear response to a specific environmental question

We start with the decision you need to make: whether a proposed change needs further assessment, what information is missing or how to respond to an identified risk. We establish the question and the operational context so that the advice relates to the actual process, facility or project stage rather than a generic description of the topic.

We examine the decisions, technical descriptions, test results or correspondence relevant to the question. We explain how the information connects and distinguish supported findings from matters requiring further evidence. Where several courses of action are available, we outline what each means for working arrangements, the documentation needed and the involvement of appropriate technical specialists.

The outcome may be an expert opinion, recommendations or a plan for further action. Its depth reflects the complexity of the issue and the available evidence. If documents alone cannot support a reliable answer, we identify the necessary measurements, checks or separate study rather than presenting an assumption as an established finding.

Technical data

Subject Specific obligations, project changes and operational risks
Service type Specialist consultation and expert opinion
Assessment basis and requirements Documents relating to the issue and environmental requirements considered against the facts supplied by the client.
Method
  1. Define the question and the decision the client needs to make.
  2. Review technical data, decisions and relevant correspondence.
  3. Compare possible actions and identify information gaps.
  4. Prepare a reasoned response and organise the next steps.
Delivery model KFB Enviro with a partner/subcontractor

What you receive

You receive an opinion, recommendations or a next-step plan addressing the agreed question. The document separates findings from assumptions, explains material limitations and identifies information needed for a subsequent decision. It can inform internal discussions, the scope of design work or a specialist commission addressing the issue that has been identified.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch

Environmental training for management teams

Environmental knowledge for management decisions

We develop the programme around participants' roles and the decisions they make. We identify environmental topics relevant to the organisation, how information reaches management and situations requiring leadership involvement. This keeps the training focused on understanding consequences and responsibilities rather than on technical detail that belongs with the organisation's specialist teams.

We explore the relationships between operations, investment, documentation and oversight of environmental obligations. Decision-making scenarios illustrate what information managers need and when a further assessment is appropriate. Participants build a shared understanding of key terms, recognise risk signals and practise asking useful questions of environmental, operations and capital project teams before a decision is taken.

The content and level of detail reflect the organisation and participants' existing knowledge. Training supports informed management but does not replace assessment of a particular issue or review of facility documents. If questions raised during the session need source evidence, we explain what information is required to move from general understanding to a project-specific decision.

Technical data

Subject Environmental responsibilities, risks and obligations in management
Service type Training for board members and management teams
Assessment basis and requirements The organisation's activities, participants' roles and selected requirements relevant to the management decisions discussed.
Method
  1. Identify learning needs and the decisions within participants' remit.
  2. Prepare a programme linked to the organisation's activities.
  3. Discuss decision scenarios and the reporting of environmental risks.
  4. Summarise key lessons and questions for subsequent internal work.
Delivery model KFB Enviro

What you receive

You receive an agreed programme, training materials and a delivered training session. The content clarifies management's role, important dependencies and questions useful for overseeing environmental matters. The materials provide a reference for discussions with operations and project teams and for recognising when the organisation needs more detailed specialist support on a particular issue.

Connect with us

Contribute to the
future we are creating

Get in touch