Locate potential risks before commissioning intrusive investigation

We reconstruct site uses from available historical material, process documentation and information supplied by the owner or operator. The review looks for locations associated with substance storage, production, waste handling and incidents that may have affected the ground. Confirmed facts are distinguished from assumptions and areas where reliable information is limited or absent.

Potential sources are connected to possible contaminant migration pathways and current or proposed land uses. Existing investigation results are reviewed in terms of location, age and actual coverage. This identifies questions already partly answered and areas needing targeted investigation, rather than selecting sampling locations without a clear link to the site's history.

The preliminary review helps define the next stage but does not demonstrate that an entire property is free from contamination. An absence of recorded incidents is not proof that none occurred. Findings help investors, operators or transaction advisers consider additional documents, intrusive investigation or clarification of a specific risk before making further commitments.

Technical data

What you receive

You receive a preliminary report and programme of next steps identifying potential contamination sources, the quality of available evidence and significant uncertainties. Recommendations organise the need for further documentation or investigation. The material helps commission purposeful follow-up work and explains which conclusions cannot yet be supported by a review of the property's history alone.

Design an investigation around the site's actual questions

Site history, earlier findings and the assignment's purpose determine which areas and substances need investigation. The programme proposes locations, depths and sample types appropriate to the available understanding. Access restrictions, infrastructure and practical arrangements are considered so issues requiring clarification can be addressed before specialist teams enter an operating facility or development site.

We coordinate agreed fieldwork and laboratory analysis undertaken by partners or subcontractors. Samples are linked to their locations, field records and commissioned analytical scope. When results are available, we check completeness and interpret the evidence against the investigation purpose, site conditions and relevant criteria, explaining the limitations associated with the representativeness of the samples collected.

Findings inform whether the investigation is sufficient or needs to be extended in coverage or analytical scope. A single campaign does not automatically describe changes in groundwater quality over time and is not a complete monitoring programme. Measured findings are clearly distinguished from interpretation between investigation points, avoiding unjustified certainty in subsequent decisions.

Technical data

What you receive

You receive the investigation programme, collected results and an interpretation linked to the agreed objective. The material connects findings to sampling locations, explains investigation limits and identifies any need to extend the work. Specialist activities and laboratory analysis may be subcontracted; the documentation provided reflects the agreed programme and the activities actually completed.

Scope and limitations

Specialist work and laboratory analysis may be subcontracted

Connect laboratory results with the locations they actually represent

We establish the investigation objective, history of the area and processes that may have affected its condition. Previous investigations and proposed land-use changes are reviewed. Sampling points, depths and analytical parameters are then defined for the agreed task, with a clear explanation of which questions the proposed sampling arrangement can address and which remain outside its coverage.

We coordinate the field partner's work and transfer of samples to an appropriate laboratory. Results are linked to sample locations and descriptions, then interpreted against the identified conditions and criteria selected for the site. Where historical results are available, we assess whether comparisons are meaningful given differences in depth, methods and sampling point selection.

Interpretation distinguishes an analytical result from a conclusion about the wider area. Findings at one point are not extended across a property without justification. Laboratory analyses are provided by the appropriate partner, while KFB Enviro coordinates the scope and interpretation. Further investigations, remediation planning or physical works require a separate scope informed by the evidence obtained.

Technical data

What you receive

You receive an investigation report and interpretation identifying sampling points, depths and analytical scope. It explains how the results address the investigation purpose and where coverage remains limited. The material supports planning of subsequent site activities, including additional investigations where needed, without treating unsampled areas as if their condition had been established.

Scope and limitations

Laboratory testing is performed by an appropriate laboratory or partner